Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) founder Abhijit Deepke has criticised the Delhi Police after sharing an old video in which a police officer appears to address gangster Lawrence Bishnoi as “Lawrence Bishnoi Sahab” during a press conference. Deepke questioned the way the police deal with criminal suspects and protesters, arguing that students and activists raising their demands should receive fair treatment rather than face what he described as disproportionate action.
The video circulated on social media after Deepke posted it on his X account. His comments renewed debate over police conduct, the language used by officials while speaking about accused criminals, and the treatment of people participating in protests. However, reports cited in the supplied news coverage indicate that the video dates back to 2025 and that the officer involved described the wording as an accidental slip of the tongue. The clip is therefore not evidence of a new statement made by the police in October 2026.
Why Abhijit Deepke Shared the Delhi Police Video
Deepke shared the video to question what he sees as a difference in the way authorities treat alleged criminals and people involved in demonstrations. In his post, he referred to the apparent use of the honorific “Sahab” for Lawrence Bishnoi and said he wished the police would show even a fraction of similar courtesy to students and activists who were protesting over their demands.
Deepke’s criticism focused on the broader issue of police priorities. He argued that law-enforcement agencies should concentrate on investigating criminal activity and identifying those responsible for offences, rather than directing their attention towards students and activists exercising their right to protest. His remarks were presented as a criticism of the police response to demonstrations and a call for what he considers more balanced enforcement.
In another post, the CJP founder reiterated his position that the police should focus on alleged offenders instead of taking action against protesters. He argued that problems arise when the priorities of the government and police are perceived to be misplaced. These statements reflect Deepke’s political criticism; they should not be treated as an independent finding about the conduct of the Delhi Police.
Delhi Police Officer Says the Word Was an Accidental Slip
Reports about the video identify the officer as Abhishek Dhania, a Delhi Police officer who was speaking during a press conference. According to the supplied coverage, Dhania described the use of “Sahab” while referring to Lawrence Bishnoi as a slip of the tongue. He reportedly explained that he had recently met a former senior officer, Ombir Bishnoi, and that the name was on his mind when he made the statement.
The explanation offers a different context from the interpretation highlighted in Deepke’s social media post. While Deepke questioned the wording and what it might suggest about police attitudes, the officer reportedly said the expression was unintentional. The available reports do not establish that the officer intended to show special respect to the gangster.
The distinction is important when assessing a viral video. A short clip can draw attention to a particular phrase, but the circumstances surrounding the statement and any explanation offered by the speaker also matter. In this case, the reports describe the video as old and attribute the wording to an accidental verbal error rather than a deliberate expression of deference.
Why the Old Video Has Returned to Public Discussion
The video resurfaced amid wider public discussion about law enforcement, protests and high-profile criminal cases. Deepke’s post connected the clip to concerns about how authorities respond to students and activists. By sharing the footage, he sought to draw attention to what he considers an inconsistency between the treatment of people demonstrating over their demands and the language used by a police officer while referring to a suspected gangster.
Social media can rapidly bring older recordings back into public view, particularly when they are connected to a current controversy. However, the date and context of a recording are essential to understanding its significance. The reports supplied for this article identify the video as being from 2025, not a newly recorded press conference in October 2026.
For readers, the central questions are what the original footage shows, what the officer said about the remark, and how Deepke interpreted it. Separating the recorded event from subsequent political commentary helps readers evaluate the issue without confusing an old clip with a current development.
Abhijit Deepke’s Criticism of Police Action Against Protesters
Deepke’s comments also focused on the treatment of students and activists who take part in protests. He maintained that people raising legitimate demands should be treated with appropriate respect and that police resources should be directed towards investigating criminal offences. His criticism reflects a wider debate about the balance between maintaining public order and protecting the rights of people who participate in peaceful demonstrations.
Police authorities are responsible for enforcing the law and responding to potential offences. At the same time, the handling of demonstrations can attract scrutiny when protesters or political groups allege that enforcement has been unfair. Whether any particular police action was justified depends on the facts of the individual case, the applicable law and the evidence available. The video alone does not establish how all student protests or criminal investigations have been handled.
Deepke’s remarks have brought these issues into the conversation surrounding the viral clip. His statements are political criticism of the police approach, while the officer’s reported explanation addresses the specific wording heard in the recording. Both aspects are relevant to understanding why the video has attracted attention.
Connection With the Tiger Shroff Firing Case
The supplied news reports also connect Deepke’s comments to public discussion following a firing incident involving actor Tiger Shroff’s car in Mumbai. According to the reports, shots were fired at the vehicle, and people including the actor’s driver were reported injured. Mumbai Police began investigating the incident, and the case prompted renewed attention to security concerns involving prominent personalities.
The incident formed part of the broader context in which Deepke criticised police priorities and called for attention to be directed towards criminal activity. However, the Mumbai firing investigation and the older Delhi Police video are separate matters. The existence of one does not establish a connection between the two incidents, and claims about responsibility for the firing should be attributed to investigators or reliable reporting rather than assumed.
Reports about the Mumbai case have described an investigation involving multiple police teams. Details about suspects, motives and responsibility can change as an investigation progresses, so those developments should be checked against current police statements and verified reporting before being presented as confirmed facts.
What Is Known About the Viral Video?
The available reports provide several key details about the recording. It features Abhishek Dhania speaking at a Delhi Police press conference and apparently using the expression “Lawrence Bishnoi Sahab”. The video is reported to date from 2025. Following its circulation on social media, Deepke criticised the wording and questioned the police’s approach to protesters. The officer reportedly explained that the expression was an accidental slip linked to a recent meeting with a former senior officer named Ombir Bishnoi.
These details help distinguish the established reporting from the opinions expressed online. The phrase itself can be heard in the video as described by the reports, while the suggestion that it demonstrates a particular attitude towards a gangster is an interpretation advanced by critics. The reported explanation from the officer is that the wording was unintentional.
Readers should also be cautious about sharing old footage without its date or context. When a video is reposted during a new controversy, viewers may mistakenly believe that it records a recent event. Checking the original date, the full statement and subsequent clarifications can help prevent misunderstandings.
Why Context Matters in Viral News
The controversy illustrates how a brief phrase from a press conference can become the focus of a larger political argument. Deepke has used the clip to raise questions about police conduct and the treatment of protesters, while the officer’s reported explanation places the wording in the context of an accidental verbal error. Understanding both the criticism and the response is necessary for an accurate account of the story.
Public officials are often scrutinised for their language, especially when discussing serious criminal cases. At the same time, a verbal mistake should not automatically be interpreted as proof of an official’s intentions without additional evidence. Responsible reporting distinguishes what is visible in the recording, what the individuals involved have said, and what remains a matter of interpretation.
The incident also underlines the importance of accurately dating material shared on social media. An old video can become relevant to a current debate, but that does not make the original event new. In this case, the supplied reports describe the recording as old and state that the officer attributed the wording to a slip of the tongue.
Conclusion
Abhijit Deepke’s post about the “Lawrence Bishnoi Sahab” video has renewed discussion about police language, public accountability and the treatment of protesters. The CJP founder criticised what he views as misplaced priorities, arguing that students and activists deserve fair treatment and that law-enforcement agencies should focus on criminal activity.
However, the reports indicate that the video is from 2025 and that the officer involved, Abhishek Dhania, explained the wording as an accidental slip. The available information does not establish that the phrase was intended as a deliberate show of respect towards Lawrence Bishnoi. The issue therefore needs to be understood in context, with a clear distinction between the recorded statement, the officer’s explanation and Deepke’s political criticism.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who shared the viral Delhi Police video?
Abhijit Deepke, founder of the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), shared the video on his social media account on X.
2. Why is the video being discussed?
The video shows a Delhi Police officer apparently referring to Lawrence Bishnoi as “Sahab”. Deepke criticised the wording and compared it with the treatment of students and activists who participate in protests.
3. Which police officer appears in the video?
The supplied reports identify the officer as Abhishek Dhania, who was speaking at a press conference.
4. Is the video recent?
No. The supplied reports state that the video dates back to 2025, although it resurfaced on social media in October 2026.
5. What explanation did the officer reportedly give?
According to the reports, Dhania described the wording as a slip of the tongue and said he had recently met a former senior officer named Ombir Bishnoi.
6. What did Abhijit Deepke say about students and activists?
Deepke argued that students and activists raising their demands should be treated with respect and that police should focus on criminal activity rather than unfairly targeting protesters.
7. Is the video connected to the Tiger Shroff firing case?
The supplied reports discuss Deepke’s criticism in the wider context of the Mumbai firing incident. However, the older Delhi Police video and the Mumbai investigation are separate matters.
0 Comments